I've enjoyed reading through G.K. Chesterton's What's Wrong with the World, and because the nature of humanity has not changed he remains insightful and strangely prophetic. Chesterton was able, with eloquence and humorous poise, to point out inconsistent folly in his day which has continued unabated until now. I see no reason why these observations will not remain relevant for another hundred years - or until we start actually learning from our mistakes.
One of the paragraphs I have turned back to a couple of times concerns a modern approach to education, one that was on display during the life of Chesterton and I have also observed myself. There is a push in an effort to "save the children" to inject new and virtually unproved methods and programs to benefit students. Recent examples of this are "Common Core" curriculum pushed through in the United States and the ridiculous "Safe Schools" program in Australia. It seems many schools and governments which fund them have a different vision from the educational system which produced their minds. It seems like philosophies concerning education can overrule practical reading, writing, and arithmetic, even as the Chairman's "Great Leap Forward" was a self-inflicted catastrophe. What students write about and how they express themselves seems more important these days than actually knowing how to write and communicate effectively. The ever-elusive lure of using compulsory education to shape the minds of others into one agreeable with our own is as strong as ever.
Consider the musings of Chesterton on the subject:
One of the paragraphs I have turned back to a couple of times concerns a modern approach to education, one that was on display during the life of Chesterton and I have also observed myself. There is a push in an effort to "save the children" to inject new and virtually unproved methods and programs to benefit students. Recent examples of this are "Common Core" curriculum pushed through in the United States and the ridiculous "Safe Schools" program in Australia. It seems many schools and governments which fund them have a different vision from the educational system which produced their minds. It seems like philosophies concerning education can overrule practical reading, writing, and arithmetic, even as the Chairman's "Great Leap Forward" was a self-inflicted catastrophe. What students write about and how they express themselves seems more important these days than actually knowing how to write and communicate effectively. The ever-elusive lure of using compulsory education to shape the minds of others into one agreeable with our own is as strong as ever.
Consider the musings of Chesterton on the subject:
"Now most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities. And Mr. Shaw and such people are especially shrinking from that awful and ancestral responsibility to which our fathers committed us when they took the wild step of becoming men. I mean the responsibility of affirming the truth of our human tradition and handing it on with a voice of authority, an unshaken voice. That is the one eternal education; to be sure enough that something is truth that you dare to tell it to a child. From this high audacious duty the moderns are fleeing on every side; and the only excuse for them is, (of course,) that their modern philosophies are so half-baked and hypothetical that they cannot convince themselves enough to convince even a newborn babe. This, of course, is connected with the decay of democracy; and is somewhat of a separate subject...The trouble in too many of our modern schools is that the State, being controlled so specially by the few, allows cranks and experiments to go straight to the schoolroom when they have never passed through the Parliament, the public house, the private house, the church, or the marketplace. Obviously, it ought to be the oldest things that are taught to the youngest people; the assured and experienced truths that are put first to the baby. But in a school today the baby has to submit to a system that is younger than himself. The flopping infant of four actually has more experience, and has weathered the world longer, than the dogma to which he is made to submit...Today we all use Popular Education as meaning education of the people. I wish I could use it as meaning education by the people." (Chesterton, G. K. What's Wrong With The World. 1st ed. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1910. Print.)Nothing in this world is truly new unless God makes it so. It is not a new way that is needed, but the true way - a hotly debated topic in a subjective society when anyone is bold enough to step near to it. I have observed this in churches as well as in the education sector, that a fresh approach is needed to reach a new generation. I am all for freshness as far as fruit and vegetables go, but let us call them what they are. New wine should be placed in new wineskins, and it should be called new wine. The modern approach to freshness is to avoid talk of man's sin, judgment, hell, man's need for repentance for salvation, and the blood of Jesus which cleanses us through faith. This is not fresh; this is folly. Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. If we do not believe in the truth of the Bible ourselves, it does no good for us to offer it as one option among many. There is the saving Gospel, and there is everything else. Jeremiah 6:16 says, "Thus says the LORD: "Stand in the ways and see, and ask for the old paths, where the good way is, and walk in it; then you will find rest for your souls. But they said, 'We will not walk in it.'" It is the ancient way which is the good, right way. You will see many different gaits and a variety of people joyfully travelling this road, and there are few who find it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
To uphold the integrity of this site, no comments with links for advertising will be posted. No ads here! :)